April 2026
The Epstein Production : 2
"I will tell you, you're not gonna have a war with me and
you're not gonna have a world war with me, that I can tell you."
-Donald Trump (presidential campaign rally)
Following Epstein file disclosures and his consequent historic arrest on 19 February, on suspicion of misconduct in public office during his tenure as Britain's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, almost 75% of several thousand respondents to a straw poll considered that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor will either get off scot free or without serious punishment—even if sex-related allegations are also brought to bear.
The ex-Prince
Clearly, the King's subsequent damage-control statement that "the law must take its course" was taken with a very large grain of salt. Especially as he himself, like his late mother, stands accused of covering for his brother whose lust, greed and grasping compromised himself, and so the nation. Veteran American criminal investigator Thomas Hampson summarises the gravity of the evidence contained in the Epstein files:
The released emails document a pattern in which the former prince forwarded official government reports on his overseas trade visits to Epstein within minutes of receiving them. One email thread dated November 30, 2010, shows Mountbatten-Windsor forwarding a report from his special adviser to Epstein covering trade visits to Vietnam, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shenzhen. A second exchange the following month appears to describe what Mountbatten-Windsor called a "confidential brief" on potential investment opportunities in Afghanistan’s Helmand province. In this region, British military forces were then active.
A member of the British royal family, serving in an official government trade capacity, was forwarding restricted government assessments—including information about potential investments in a combat zone—to a private financier with documented ties to multiple intelligence services. Whether Mountbatten-Windsor understood the significance of his actions is a question for the criminal investigation now underway. That the information was valuable to an operator of Epstein’s kind is not in doubt.
"The Prince of Darkness"
Misconduct in public office in the United Kingdom is such a grave offence that it carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment—a prospect also weighing upon Peter Mandelson. A survivor of more scandals than his evil twin Tony Blair, this renowned practitioner of the dark arts, arrested on 23 February also on suspicion of misconduct in public office, may finally get his just desserts. Hampson again:
The Mandelson case is, in some respects, more consequential than Mountbatten-Windsor’s because it involves multiple categories of improper sharing of sensitive information with Epstein over several years, including information about the most significant economic policy decisions in decades.
In June 2009, while serving as Business Secretary, Mandelson appears to have forwarded to Epstein details of internal proposals to sell off UK government assets as part of the Treasury’s crisis response—information whose value to someone like Epstein was immediate. In late 2009, emails show Mandelson and Epstein developing a strategy to push back against the UK government’s proposed banker bonus supertax—working against his own government’s policy on behalf of the financial sector. In March 2010, he assisted Epstein and JPMorgan’s Jes Staley in lobbying US Treasury official Larry Summers against proposed American banking restrictions—a serving British Cabinet minister helping a convicted sex offender [Epstein; convicted in 2008] lobby American financial regulators on behalf of a US bank.
On May 9, 2010, Mandelson emailed Epstein to inform him that the European Union’s €500 billion Eurozone rescue facility would be ‘announced tonight.’ The announcement came the following day, triggering the euro’s largest rally in two years. On May 10, Mandelson informed Epstein that Gordon Brown had resigned as Prime Minister.
Tax attorney Dan Neidle summarised the pattern: Mandelson was not just leaking sensitive UK government information to Epstein. He was leaking US government secrets, essentially to Wall Street as well. In light of the MEGA Group’s documented interest in influencing governments on financial and foreign policy matters,[1] the significance of this information to Epstein and his clients is obvious.
Bank records show three payments totaling $75,000 to accounts linked to Mandelson between 2003 and 2004. In 2009, after his conviction, Epstein paid $10,000 toward the education of his [homosexual] partner’s child. Mandelson has resigned from the Labour Party and the House of Lords.
A rigged game
Andrew Mountbattern-Windsor was released under investigation, which means he is not on bail, has no conditions, and faces no restrictions such as curfews or travel bans. For now, he goes about his daily life as the police investigation continues. As for Mandelson, who has resigned from the Labour Party and the House of Lords, police announced on 6 March that his bail has been lifted and his passport returned to him after they determined he is not a flight risk. While Mandelson denies any wrongdoing, the investigation into allegations against him remains ongoing.
As the straw poll mentioned at the outset revealed, however, there appears to be very little public confidence in the justice system convicting compromised, self-serving elites and enablers. A professional opinion poll would probably yield a similar result: reflecting acute awareness and distrust of a globalist system long rigged against the hoi polloi and now confirmed beyond all doubt by the private network of power unveiled by the files.
(Although we are concentrating herein on its satanic sexual aspect, we must bear in mind that it was not primarily a sex-trafficking network but a network of access and information which Epstein kept flowing by way of leverage gained using young women, adolescents, children, and infants. Thomas Hampson neatly summed up what we have termed the Epstein Production as "a multi-decade intelligence penetration of Western democratic institutions, using sexual exploitation as its mechanism, organised crime networks as part of its logistical framework, and a network of compromised elites as its information sources".)
Nonetheless, the two arrests effected in Britain (of Mountbatten-Windsor and Mandelson) shames America, where not a single arrest has been made since the mass release of files despite the sort of shocking disclosures we noted in Part 1. When even the notoriously corrupt European Commission steals a march on you (by also referring Mandelson to fraud investigators for allegedly leaking sensitive government information to Epstein), you know the jig is up and your political and judicial system is rigged beyond repair.
The files themselves continue to throw up clear evidence of this endemic corruption, such as attempts to suppress and destroy evidence concerning Epstein's 'suicide.'
For example, fresh documents have revealed "a shocking intrusion into the FBI’s New York City office on Super Bowl Sunday in 2023, resulting in the loss of approximately 100TB of evidence." FBI Special Agent Aaron Spivack detailed the breach in a declaration, stating, "500 terabytes of data was gone as a result of the intrusion. I was able to recover about 400 terabytes of that data, however. I was told to Google how to recover the data. No one else tried to help us." I'll bet they didn't!
In describing his discovery of unusual computer activity involving two IP addresses, Spivack said "The activity included combing through certain files pertaining to the Epstein investigation." Somehow an unidentifiable computer had accessed their network, "either by being plugged into the network, or possibly by telnetting in virtually."
Patently an effort to suppress evidence in the Epstein case, an online media outlet stated that: "These disclosures build on anomalies detailed in our prior reports, where DOJ documents referenced Epstein’s death as a “MURDER” and highlighted red flags like mismatched autopsy details and missing footage. The inconsistencies point to elite protection of the operation."
Consider, too, that between 1999 and 2001 there is a gap of 25,000 missing files! This was the period of the tech bubble blow-up, the Lewinsky impeachment trial of Clinton, the hotly disputed 2000 presidential that elected GW Bush, and of course 9/11. What damning evidence is now conveniently missing in those regards?
Meanwhile, all manner of sinister goings on are repeatedly revealed in files that have survived being purged. A jaw-dropping parallel 9/11 commission, for instance! In an email of 1 May 2003 from Ed Epstein (no relation) to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein asks:
Any interest in being on the Shadow Commission on 9/11. The membership is secret.
Let me know.
Maxwell replies:
Thanks for the invite - Unfortunately I cannot be on the shadow commission.
The mind boggles!
Gates, vaccines & the Taliban
It seems that nothing and nowhere was out of reach. Justice Department emails show that Epstein helped the Gates Foundation gain access to the Taliban—receiving confidential reports and intelligence on Pakistani military operations in the process. Drop Site News reported (27/2/26):
The email correspondence in the disclosures about Pakistan came a few years before the collapse of the U.S.-backed government in neighboring Afghanistan. They also suggest that Epstein’s interest in the region was not strictly limited to public health matters. [...] Epstein also received confidential reports and on-the-ground military intelligence, including sensitive information about NATO operations at Zhob Airport, a small domestic airport in Balochistan, only an hour’s flight away from the Afghan capital in Kabul.
Epstein leveraged his relationship with Gates and contacts in the region to become a central figure in Pakistan’s anti-polio efforts from 2013 to 2018. By personally orchestrating the partnership between the Gates Foundation and IPI [International Peace Institute], Epstein positioned himself as the gatekeeper for the Gates-Pakistan relationship for five years. [...]
Through his connection to [Gates' chief science and tech advisor Boris] Nikolic, Epstein had established himself within a span of a few months as an indispensable advisor to the Gates Foundation’s global polio work. Since IPI owed its association and a lucrative contract with the foundation to Epstein’s connection, the think tank reported directly to him, as if he were the head of the project.
[...] Polio vaccination has been the subject of major controversy in Pakistan since the CIA used a fake polio vaccination campaign to collect DNA samples from Osama bin Laden’s family, before the operation to assassinate Bin Laden in Abbottabad in 2011. .... “Pakistan has never recovered from the fake vaccination campaign blow,” said one Pakistani doctor associated with the polio campaign. “Now this entire Epstein saga will... put millions of Pakistani children at risk. Just the thought of Gates and Epstein ‘helping’ children is enough to give any parent nightmares.”
Of course, had they been paying attention during the long years before "the Epstein saga" roused them, Pakistani doctors themselves would have been having "nightmares" about the psychotic vax-obsessed Gates "'helping' children"! Instead, like so many others both before, during and after Covid, they shamefully turned a blind eye while collaborating with Gates and taking money from his Foundation—all despite his reputation for devilish schemes and catastrophic vaccine rollouts in Asia of which the rest of us were well aware.
As for his diabolical accomplice, it turns out that during the years of Pakistani somnolence Epstein had been asked to his face about his devilish persona.
The "good mirror"
In a 2-hour interview found in the files, conducted by MAGA political operative Steve Bannon at Epstein's New York home (part of 15+ hours of interviews; designed either to rehabilitate or expose him), Epstein discussed his wealth, criminal activities, and views on morality, admitting in the process that he was a "tier one" sexual predator while smugly claiming to be "the lowest" in his classification.
Bannon asked: "Do you think you’re the devil himself?"
Epstein replied: "No, but I have a good mirror."
Delivered sarcastically with a smirk, this response has been variously interpreted by experts and commentators as revealing:
• A deeply narcissistic self-awareness and a lack of remorse. The "good mirror" suggests he has no internal conflict or shame; his reflection isn’t distorted by guilt because he doesn’t view himself as morally wrong.
• Full awareness of his actions and how others perceive him.
Pride in his image, even if it reflects monstrosity.
• A hallmark of psychopathy. The remark underscores his belief in his own superiority and invincibility, even in the face of grave accusations
• His narcissism and detachment, framing his actions not as evil but as a matter of self-reflection and personal power. The remark also echoes his broader pattern of deflection and provocation, using dark humour to disarm critics while hinting at his awareness of his own depravity.
At times he eschewed all hinting to embrace his deviance! In an email of 28 December 2018 responding to Masha Drokova, who had recommended and sent a friend to him, he said:
your friend alleza told me about the project she is doing researching a really bad guy that gets children for sex sent to his island. She almost fainted when i told her that person is me
Pizzagate redux
The Pakistanis are not alone in suffering ongoing Epstein-effects. Even posthumously they roll on ruinously, in all facets of national and international life. Yet while the foregoing revelations and all we revealed in Part 1 read like a fantastical Bond screenplay, bear in mind that it constitutes the merest glimpse of the Epstein script and network of actors involved in its production.
One could also record the incessant allusions to child sex-trafficking using well-known paedophile codewords (long listed in a 2007 FBI handbook) for young boys and girls, and similar codes apropos adrenochrome (blood harvested from tortured children that adults drink or take intravenously as a sort of youth elixir) and cannibalising babies and infants.
Apropos the latter abomination—long discussed in Hollywood circles and exposed by actors like Roseanne Barr—it seems that "beef jerky," constantly mentioned in the files, is code for human flesh. A witness statement also describes ritualistic abuse of a child on a yacht who is disembowelled and cannibalised. There also appear to be regular coded allusions to the hunting of humans.
It is all redolent of Pizzagate; the notorious paedophile scandal that erupted in Washington in 2016, after top Clinton operative John Podesta left his phone in a taxi and 50,000 of his emails were subsequently leaked by Wikileaks. Those mails were replete with the same paedophile codes: e.g., “hotdog” = boy; “pizza” = girl; “cheese” = little girl; “pasta” = little boy; “cheese pizza”= child pornography; “map” = semen; “sauce” = orgy; “ice cream” = male prostitute; etcetera.
The dates of the Podesta mails were from 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010—the exact same time frame as the constant mentions in the Epstein emails of "pizza", "cheese pizza" and other codes above. Doubtless due to the Pizzagate exposure, later Epstein file emails around 2017-18 do not use "pizza" as often, substituting foods like "steak" instead. But not one of the 911 mentions of pizza in the Epstein mails is a receipt for the purchase of an actual pizza. Many such mails comprise just a single line, no context, and a lot of winking emojis. Moreover, one survivor, "Rina", who lived with Epstein together with another girl, said in a recent interview that she never saw him eat pizza or beef jerky. Nor was either food ever in the fridge, and there was never a pizza party at his home.
Although the Pizzagate emails hailed from the Clinton/Obama circles of influence, when queried about the scandal during her recent Epstein-questioning by a pathetic House Committee, Hilary Clinton was left free to scoff at the "insanity" of Pizzagate allegations due to the unpreparedness of her Congressional inquisitors. They did not even bother to bring along and confront her with photos of the sickening 'art collection' of Tony Podesta, John's brother, featuring little children tied and bound, demonic sculptures, and other material that screamed child sexual abuse and trafficking.
Nor were they dutifully armed with evidence of other damning material unearthed during Pizzagate investigations: such as photos of the grotesque "spirit cooking" dinners run by Marina Abramović, a self-described "performance artist" (read: satanist) popular with Western elites, at which food was eaten off naked bodies, adults and children were pictured immersed in tubs of fake blood, and violent and filthy demonic expressions and exhortations were scrawled across walls.
As for the Obama circle, those convinced that Barack Obama and Joe Biden were immersed in Pizzagate wickedness were not reassured by Obama being filmed making a "friendship bracelet" as a present for Biden's 55th birthday, with charms consisting of children's blocks and a slice of pizza. Alarm bells rang even louder when the leaked emails revealed him notifying his inner circle of the tens of thousands of dollars-worth of “hot dogs” he had ordered to be flown into the White House from Chicago (“hot dogs” being paedophile code for little boys, as we noted above.)
Even as the corporate media was working overtime to hose down the uproar for their bosses—to label Pizzagate a "conspiracy theory," which, like Hilary, they still do to this day—hardened FBI agents were said to be traumatised, reportedly throwing up while combing through the paedophilic/satanic ritual abuse photos and videos they uncovered during associated investigations.
In retrospect, one might say that Epstein was Pizza Gate.
Franklin and Sound of Freedom
The Epstein files also recall and validate the Franklin scandal.
Recorded in Senator John DeCamp's 1992 exposé, The Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska, the heroic DeCamp revealed a vast network of child abuse, ritual murder, Iran-Contra money laundering, and a nationwide child prostitution ring tied to powerful politicians and corporate figures from both major parties.
One of those leading names still covered over to this day was GHW Bush. The distraught parents of Omaha, Nebraska, "the staging and organising ground for the trafficking," always strongly suspected Bush of being part of the network and the reason so many people were blackmailed, threatened by the FBI to maintain silence, or murdered (DeCamp counted "15 to 30 strange deaths linked to this case"). In a rarely referenced confession, Paul Bonacci confirmed Bush’s participation.
Bonacci was one of the tragic Franklin victims trafficked throughout his life from a young age. He was considered a credible witness by a judge in a related Franklin case that he miraculously won despite murderous threats and a compromised judiciary. (He was even awarded $1 million in damages for the endless abuse he suffered. He never received a penny of the award but it did not bother him since all he ever wanted was to be believed.) His success at trial was surely aided by the testimony of a world expert in the multiple personality disorder (nowadays “dissociative identity disorder”) that Bonacci suffered due to MK Ultra mind-control programming to which he and other trafficked children were subjected from a young age. She claimed that in interrogating Bonacci she found he possessed a phenomenal 100% accurate recall of past events in his life, even the most minor ones, going back decades. This was made possible by the compartmentalisation of his mind via myriad ‘personalities’ engineered by the paedophile network for its criminal ends. Thus, he never once lied or sought to evade a query from the expert. If he knew the answer he gave it to her. If not, he simply said he didn’t know.
It was during a lengthy private debrief by retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson (videoed and perhaps still discoverable online) that Bonacci claimed to have personally watched two little pre-pubescent boys (one of whom he knew personally, another he recognised but did not know personally) give GHW Bush oral sex in Washington in the 1980s while Bush was serving as vice-president.
(Note: Other countries have also been led by men credibly accused of paedohopilia: e.g., Paul Vanden Boeynants [Belgium], Pierre Trudeau [Canada], and Ted Heath [Britain]. Detailed information about the first two can be found in online interviews given by Anneke Lucas, one of their renowned victims, while former veteran Scotland Yard detective Jon Wedger has regularly testified online to the truth of common claims about Heath’s wickedness.)
As a measure of how little has changed in the 22 years that have elapsed since I referenced the Franklin scandal in part one of my two-part series Satan in the Public Square, simply consider these few snippets from my 2004 essay:
• Paul Bonacci, one of the children DeCamp represented successfully in court, documented in his diary that in 1984 he had been flown to Sacramento and taken to Bohemian Grove, at a different time to the annual gathering recounted above. (He described the place in detail including the giant carved owl, though of course didn't know it was called Bohemian Grove.) There, he was filmed being brutally abused himself while being made to abuse two other boys, one of whom had his head blown off right next to him. The corpse, Bonacci alleged, was later discarded from a plane, like garbage, as the perpetrators flew him and the other boy to the next 'assignment' to be passed around among wealthy predators like toys.
• Asked by the [radio] interviewer about the photographs and other evidence he had been privy to as attorney representing some of the victims in the case, the "prominent faces in these photographs" and whether "it is fair to say that there is a sexual blackmail gridlock in Washington today?" Decamp replied: "It's gridlock by sexual blackmail. That's what's going on between the Republicans and the Democrats right now. It's absolutely tragic… In my book, I describe how I was at the Republican National Convention in Dallas and a lot of these young people, who were victims, were there at the same time. I didn't have any idea what was going on back then."
• To read The Franklin Cover-up is to enter a world of unspeakable satanic cruelty against children at the highest levels of public life. It is gruelling and scarcely believable. Indeed, many don't believe the descriptions of the violations described in such cases. As DeCamp told the radio interviewer: "… the problem is that gap between something outrageous and what the average human being is capable of believing based on their own human experiences."
In her podcast of 16 November 2025, prolific author and researcher Kirby Sommers, herself once controlled as a sex slave by an immensely wealthy Jewish couple in New York, related a pertinent anecdote about Larry King (not to be confused with the famous TV personality), a central figure in the Franklin scandal orchestrating financial fraud, sex-trafficking and the sexual abuse of children. A rising black star in the Republican party at that time, Sommers recounted that King called Ronald Reagan, asking for access to a childcare facility; that it be opened to him after he was denied access by the owner, who had cottoned on to King's intentions. Reagan arranged the access. Therefore, concluded Sommers, King was more powerful than Reagan, doubtless owing to explosive sexual blackmail material in King's possession.
In light of the Epstein files all of this sounds depressingly familiar. As does the 2023 movie Sound of Freedom.
Independently produced after Hollywood predictably rejected the script about child-trafficking based on documented anti-trafficking operations, vested interests tried desperately to prevent the release of Sound of Freedom. When they failed to do so they made extraordinary and often successful efforts to sabotage those cinemas screening the film. But they could not stop the groundswell of public support that saw it become one of the most successful independent films in history. Just as they were unable to prevent the star of the movie, Jim Caviezel, and the supportive Mel Gibson from speaking truth to power during promotional interviews: about international sex-trafficking rings and the reality of adrenochrome and other horrors endured by trafficked children.
Lead actor?
Leaving aside (for the moment) endless other associated rabbit holes, we do well finally to consider one major player in the Epstein files. He appears in a damning document compiled by the FBI in December 2019 following Epstein's death. It is a list of eleven prominent suspected co-conspirators, including: Harvey Weinstein, then-Prince Andrew, Leon Black, Les Wexner, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, (Secretary of Commerce) Howard Lutnick and (former Attorney-General) William Barr—all of whom deny the allegations. Sitting atop the lot of them is one Donald J. Trump, under whose name in first place are the following allegations [my bracketed inserts]:
1. [name redacted] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her [into a lewd act]. In response [to her biting him where it hurts], Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out. (date range 1983-85). [name redacted] would have been 13-15.
2. [name redacted] remembers Epstein introduced her to Trump, saying: "This is a good one, huh?" and Trump responded "Yes." (date range roughly 1984, [name redacted] would have been 14.
As reported on 15 February by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger, the first alleged sexual and violent assault by Trump took place in New Jersey, according to FBI notes. The same woman also accused Epstein of an assault that occurred in the 1980's when she was "approximately 13 to 15 years old. The reported victim provided enough preliminary information to warrant follow-up interview," which was conducted by the FBI's Seattle, Washington, field office.
Apropos the second claim above, the FBI elaborated:
Epstein took [name redacted] in a dark green car to Mar-a-Lago to meet Donald Trump. Epstein told Trump, "This is a good one, huh" [name redacted] thought Epstein introduced her as his friend to Trump.
Epstein elbowed Trump playfully asking him, referring to Doe [the unnamed girl], "This is a good one, right?" Trump smiled and nodded in agreement. They both chuckled and Doe felt uncomfortable, but, at the time, was too young to understand why."
(As someone sarcastically commented: "It's perfectly normal for a man in his 40s to be friends with a 14-year-old girl, right? It's perfectly normal for a man in his 40s to talk about a 14-year-old girl like she's a piece of meat, instead of a child.")
Sollenberger reports that this particular testimony "carries immense credibility with the DOJ":
That claim, about an incident at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in 1994, came from a key government witness whose testimony at trial helped DOJ prosecutors convict Maxwell, the files reveal.
The victim also stated that at age 13-14 she did not at all look mature, but was skinny and looked her age. The FBI believed her as did the jury that convicted Ghislaine Maxwell of transporting this specific victim when she was under 17, with the intent to engage in illegal sexual activity.
The victim's brother also confirmed to prosecutors and the FBI that his sister spoke to him about the Mar-a-Lago Trump meeting at the time it happened. He, too, was deemed credible. He did not accuse Trump of sexual abuse. The point here, however, is that in 1994 Trump knew of Epstein's interest in underage girls. In 2002 he openly praised Epstein as a "Terrific guy... a lot of fun to be with... [and] likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." Despite this accumulated knowledge he reportedly did not phone the police to alert them to Epstein's recruitment of young girls until 2006.
Concluding his review of the foregoing claims, Sollenberger notes that:
The allegations and FBI interview are landmark revelations, undermining the White House's protestations that Trump hasn't been accused of wrongdoing and showing instead that the U.S. government has been aware of a credible Trump accuser in the Epstein files.
Gaslighting and telltale reactions
When these are added to many other seemingly credible and consistent allegations made against him down the years by around two dozen women, it is little wonder that Trump is in a blind panic, absurdly downplaying and mocking the files. Having garnered electoral support by campaigning to release them, he abruptly reversed his position once elected, all the while insisting he had "nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein" and that the files were a scam! Speaking to the assembled press in the White House he declared, for instance:
"Big hoax ... No, it's a hoax. It's started by the Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. [...] It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats. Some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net, and so they try and do the Democrats' work."
In her response to this telltale nonsense, Candace Owens, the world's leading podcaster and until recently a major Trump supporter, spoke for many:
Look, I'm happy to be stupid. I'm happy to be foolish. I was very happy to be in the basket of the deplorables. The ad hominem stuff doesn't mean anything to me. Especially when it comes to a ring that involves harming children. Okay. I just think this is so ridiculous to try to divide people and make it seem like it's a fight between the left and the right. It's not that. We are, in fact, not stupid, but we're happy to have you call us names. And when I hear him say that, it just inspires me more to look into this. I really think that nothing should commit us further to wanting to unpack the Epstein story than the amount of gaslighting that is currently taking place.
Of course, given the number of massive hoaxes, unprecedented in scale and scope, to which Trump has been genuinely subjected over the past decade in a Deep State effort to break and ruin him and his family, "hoax" provides easy cover. Regardless, he is repeatedly calling on everyone to stop talking about the files and for the DOJ to stop wasting time pursuing the matter. "The DOJ should just say, we have other thing to do," he insists. This desperation peaks in his ferocious personal attacks against those responsible for releasing the files, and their ongoing demands for total transparency: viz., the lifting of all redactions within the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Demented targetting
Foremost in his cruel crosshairs is the estimable Thomas Massie: a rare breed of incorruptible Republican who bravely faced down all manner of obstacles and threats to see through the enactment of the Transparency Act. As he continues seeking justice for Epstein victims, Trump never misses an opportunity to defame him as a "traitor," a "RINO" (Republican in Name Only), "sub-human", and of course "a loser" (his reflexive perjorative). He has also attacked Massie's wife! The demented behaviour surely betrays the fear underlying his constant protestations of innocence. As does his fierce determination to destroy Massie's career by having his billionaire Zionist backers stump up $20 million dollars to unseat Massie in his Republican primary.
Could there be more telling behaviour? All directed towards a man whose principled and courageous resistance to the thoroughgoing corruption and control of U.S. politics by Epstein enablers and the Israel lobby makes him a national treasure.
Along with Democrat Ro Khanna, one of Massie's collaborators on the Transparency Act, the outspoken Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene was also subjected to intense Trump pressure that finally forced her to resign her Congressional post. And yet, in a recent 9 February interview with the Redacted podcast, she said the sort of things a truly innocent President should and would be saying, and which Trump was saying, plainly and brilliantly on behalf of the downtrodden "deplorables," during his first presidential term (my transcript and bracketed insertions; original emphases):
The release of the files, to me it's proved more to the American people than I think they can almost handle. I think people are on overload right now because it's so shocking, the things we're reading in these files. [...]
But when you see the DOJ breaking the law—they're breaking the law because they're redacting the names of former presidents, secretary of state, members of the government.... They're also deleting files that they released. Files should not be deleted once they're released to the public. [...]
I think what this shows to American [is] that our government has betrayed victims, innocent victims, in ways that we can't even comprehend, to the point of child sex trafficking, satanic rituals, maybe cannibalism, and rape, and trafficking of women. But it's the vast cover-up for the rich, powerful elites, it's really the international Deep State. And it's people that live in some sort of sphere that the common man can't even comprehend.
And it's also pulling back the veil, that sadly wasn't surprising to me, that many of the things that people have had to endure, such as Covid, such as things that happen in our economy, businesses that get supported, industries that get supported, others that get torn down, seems to be planned years in advance by this gigantic network of the international Deep State, the international elites.
And it's the stuff they call people like me, and probably you and many others conspiracy theorists [for claiming], and said that we were all crazy, but yet here it is, it's coming out. It's not a random person saying things like they're eating babies, or they're eating human flesh. It's not a random person saying that. There's a lot of people saying it... These are not one-offs; these are all throughout the files. People are not going to let this go. As much as the President wants, and the Speaker of the House wants [note: a former Speaker of the House, Denis Hastert, was jailed for paedophilia], people are not letting it go. They're absolutely outraged.
The reality is, the Trump administration is not releasing the information. I got yelled at by the President for this. This is why he called me a traitor because I would not take my name off the discharge petition because I stated firmly, I said, 'No, we are going to release the Epstein files, I'm standing with women who were raped as teenagers, I'm not standing with the government, I don't support the cover-up of all of this stuff, whatever it may be.
And the President got mad at me, and he told me, and I've said this multiple times, he told me his friends would get hurt. That's what he told me and then we're seeing this slow walk and a cover-up of a lot of this information.... The man at the top is Donald Trump, he's the President, and he's the one that was completely against releasing the files. When we started fighting to get them released, he's the one who called it a "Democrat hoax."
You know, he invites everyone to the White House, but he will not invite these women, that have defended him, by the way. They have defended him and said Donald Trump did nothing wrong. Yet he doesn't bring them in the White House, and support them. If it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, it's a duck. And that's the part that's hard to swallow.
Troubling history
Unfortunately, the women referenced by Ms Taylor Greene who absolve Trump of blame number barely two dozen; a tiny segment of the over 1,000 officially acknowledged victims, and doubtless a small portion of the real total of trafficked/abused/raped/tortured/murdered infants, children, adolescents and adults.
Two further sinister emails sent to Epstein typically allude to these victims. "Thank you for a fun night—your littlest girl was a little naughty," read a creepy mail sent to him on 11/3/14. Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna posted that the redacted name behind that mail has been unmasked as Epstein's assistant/organiser:
Susan Hamblin sent this email. She took a plea deal and was given “victim” status under previous [Democrat] DOJ. Why were a number of Epstein’s co-conspirators given plea deals for trafficking minors? Child sex traffickers do not deserve plea deals or immunity. EVER. DOJ should look into charges.
They should. Particularly if, as reported, Hamblin is also the person who sent Epstein a 30/6/14 email concerning someone who had "lied" both to the sender and to Epstein. "I give you permission to kill him," states the sender. Epstein replies, "Whoops"—a word used in a number of his mails that apparently signifies eliminating troublesome people.
Of course, neither the number of victims nor the fact that Trump appears in the files far more than anyone else are significant factors in themselves. During a 10 February interview with Axios, Democrat Jamie Raskin said that the previous day he had searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files (which Congressional members were allowed to access at the DOJ offices). It came up "more than a million times," he said. Obviously, a huge number of mentions would be inconsequential. Probably indicative of Trump Derangement Syndrome. But, justice must both be done and be seen to be done. There is more than enough suspicious or damning information revealed in the files to dismiss the President's protestations of innocence and investigate him thoroughly, especially where his relationship with Epstein is concerned.
The unredacted emails showed Trump contradicting himself in the most telling manner apropos his relations with Epstein. For instance, while speaking on the phone with Epstein's lawyer he negated his renowned claim of having kicked Epstein out of his club when he discovered he was recruiting girls there. Epstein was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, Trump told the attorney, and "we never asked him to leave."
While Trump is notoriously inconsistent, it must be said that the consistency of the accusations made against him by many women is damning. Moreover, in testimonies seen and heard by the present writer there are telltale comments they claim Trump made to them that gel with inappropriate remarks he has made about young girls down the years—not least about his own daughter.
Typical examples of repeated lascivious remarks about Ivanka include his telling Rolling Stone magazine: "If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father...", and again in 2006 on The View talk show: "I've said, if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." In 1997, he also guided Ivanka into the modelling industry as a provocatively dressed 15-year-old, via a modelling agency run by John Casablancas, a notorious paedophile who provided Epstein with a 12-year-old that Epstein assaulted. One would like to think that Trump did not know about the degenerate Casablancas; did not realise that he was placing his beloved daughter in a danger zone. But was such ignorance a tenable defence for a playboy tycoon in the know about everything else?
In an Associated Press article, twenty former employees of his TV reality show, The Apprentice, also described Trump's behaviour toward women as lewd and inappropriate. While Trump denies the claims, this is the man who was caught on tape boasting to Billy Bush that "when you're a star" you can get away with anything when it comes to manhandling women.
And then there is Trump's decades long involvement with beauty pageants, well-known gateways for abuse and human trafficking. In 1991 he judged the Look of the Year modelling competition featuring scantily clad girls as young as 14-years-old, according to a report posted last July by MeidasTouch. In this regard, the testimony of a former judge of pageants run by Trump is typical of the sober insider information available to those open to confront it. He insists that media need to look at the pageants that Trump owned for years: Miss USA and Miss Teen USA. As with all those disclosing inconvenient information about Trump, the former pageant judge is clearly fearful of violent repercussions. In a video post he stated (my transcript; original emphases):
This is all I'm going to say about this. If you're in the media, and you're looking for information, start with Billy Bush. Billy Bush hosted Miss USA, Miss Teen USA multiple times. Nancy O'Dell is another one, and then go down the rabbit hole from there. There are people that know a lot more than these two, but start there. They're celebrities. And start there, go down the rabbit hole, and I think what you're going to find is going to be very very upsetting. Don't call me. I'm not going to comment, I'm not going on TV and talking about this. This is very dangerous to sit on. If you decide to pursue this in the media, be very, very careful. These people, are dangerous.
"Katie" and "Tiffany"
Before death threats eventually thwarted her concerted efforts to sue Trump, one brave woman came forward in 2016 to relate her damning experience. Using the pseudonym "Katie Johnson," she alleged that she was raped by Trump at the age of 13 in Epstein's New York townhouse. Speaking recently to podcaster Tara Palmeri, Johnson's lawyer, who has lost touch with her and is not even sure if she is still alive, explained that he and his team met with her over several days after they flew her in from California. He said:
"Several of us interviewed her and questioned her before we went through the process of filing the suit. And I sent private investigators to verify her story. I sincerely wish I had the ability to reveal everything, to find the client, confirm her true identity and try to convince her to back it up. There's no doubt in my mind that she told the truth of everything that's in her lawsuit. Period."
Among the details she provides in her interview, "Katie" alleges that Trump would specifically ask for her because she reminded him so much of his daughter. If so, he was merely fulfilling his dark fantasy repeatedly alluded to in public, as we have seen.
Readers who seek out the 2016 "Katie Johnson" interview with the lawyers (still available online at time of writing) will also find it compelling. And deeply disturbing. As is the supporting testimony made by an eye witness to Katie's alleged abuse.
Designated "Tiffany Doe," the witness was a "party planner" who, in her early 20s, was "hired by and paid directly by Mr. Epstein from the years of 1991-2000 to attract adolescent women to attend these parties, most of which were held at what is known as the Wexner Mansion located at 9 E. 71st St. in New York city."
"Tiffany's" job was also "to personally witness and supervise encounters between the underage girls that Mr Epstein hired and his guests." In that capacity she talked "Katie Johnson" into attending "a series of parties of Mr Epstein that took place in the summer of 1994," telling her that "she would be introduced to people who could get her into the modelling profession and she would be paid for attending." In "Tiffany's" statement, available in the Epstein files and possibly somewhere online, she swore to the FBI that:
7. It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff ["Katie Johnson"] being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were both informed that she was 13 years old.
8. I personally witnessed four sexual encounters that the Plaintiff was forced to have with Mr. Trump during this period, including the fourth of these encounters where Mr. Trump forcibly raped her despite her pleas to stop.
9. I personally witnessed the one occasion where Mr Trump forced the Plaintiff ["Katie Johnson"] and a 12-year-old female named Maria to perform oral sex on Mr Trump and witnessed his physical abuse of both minors when they finished the act.
She then describes attempted rape, sodomy and threats by Epstein, on minors even younger than "Katie." She goes on:
14. I personally witnessed Defendant Trump telling the plaintiff that she shouldn't ever say anything if she didn't want to disappear like the 12-year-old Maria, and that he was capable of having her whole family killed.
15. After leaving the employment of Mr. Epstein in the year 2000, I was personally threatened by Mr. Epstein that I would be killed and my family killed as well if I ever disclosed any of the physical and sexual abuse of minor females that I had personally witnessed by Mr. Epstein and any of his guests.
The pseudonymous "Tiffany Doe" concludes her witness statement thus:
16. [...] I swear to these facts under penalty of perjury even though I fully understand that the life of myself and my family is now in grave danger.
Perhaps in even greater danger now that the files have been released and suspicious deaths are reportedly piling up, as perpetrators eliminate inconvenient 'loose ends.' In this regard, transparency 'white hats' like Thomas Massie and Marjorie Tayor Greene are stealing a march on the cover-up 'black hats' like Trump, his administration and all the Epstein Enablers, by making it known that they are not suicidal. As recently as 13 February Massie tweeted:
I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I'm a pretty good swimmer.
Missing files
Meantime, a report that over 460 files on Trump have been removed by the DOJ does nothing to help his cry of innocence. "On January 30th there were 5,361 files when you searched for Trump. Today, February 2nd, 4,896 files remain." By the end of February more specific reports emerged of 53 pages of missing FBI interviews with a victim who accused Trump. On 27 February, Massie's transparency collaborator Ro Khanna had this to say to podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen (my transcript; original emphasis):
CNN did an analysis and they found that there are at least 90 or so statements that survivors made to the FBI that are missing. And those are the most powerful things, that's where the survivors are naming who are the men who engaged in abuse or rape.
There is a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a minor child. There are four times the FBI interviewed her. Only one of these interviews has been publicly released. ... The FBI sex-trafficking unit took [the allegations of this woman] seriously. Yet three of those interviews are missing. A NPR [National Public Radio] journalist discovered this because there was a document that Massie and I forced release that said all four of these interview memorandum were produced to Ghislaine Maxwell [in her trial process] during discovery, but they are not public.
[T]o have a case where you have three documents missing and the allegations against the President of the United States, this is an enormous scandal.
And so the question is: Why the cover-up? What's in those three FBI interviews? What did this woman allegedly say about Donald Trump? And why do we not have these documents?
One psycho, or two?
Public pressure is gradually forcing the President's hand and some of the missing files may well be released. But whatever they contain and regardless of ensuing denials if explosive, his secrecy has already done untold damage to his standing in the eyes of his supporters and opponents alike. Tragically, it also gives credence to claims Epstein made about Trump to various people. These appear in assorted 2017-18 emails and include the following (transcribed as they appear).
To Larry Summers (8/2/17):
recall I've told you ... I've met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes-dangerous
To a contact (22/12/18):
trump - border line insane
To Landon Thomas Jnr (24/3/18):
I told everyone from day one. evil beyond belief. mad, and most thought I was speaking metaphorically. its obvious he could crack. stormy daniels? lies after lies after lies
To Obama ... Kathy Ruemmler (23/8/18):
you see, I know how dirty donald is.
When told that people are trying to take Trump down (12/3/18):
yes thx. it's wild. because I am the one able to take him down.
I know, I know, he's a psychopath! But like broken clocks even psychopaths are surely right every now and then. And despite the President's periodic protestations to the contrary, Epstein did hang out with Trump, who did call Epstein "a terrific guy... fun to be with."
Perhaps we have completely misread Trump? Maybe it's a case of one psychopath outing another?
Certainly, one detects unnerving traits in Trump. Such as his lack of empathy with the slaughtered Palestinians while framing a genocide as a real estate opportunity; his emotionless (filmed) response in the Oval Office when informed of Charlie Kirk's assassination; and his shoulder-shrugging acknowledgement of the mounting death toll of American soldiers in the Middle East and expectation of more deaths to follow ("that often happens in war"), without the slightest trace of regret for facilitating this needless slaughter of his own troops and Iranians (more than 1,000 of the latter already butchered by 5 March) without regard for just war principles, all on Israel's behalf.
In this latter regard, Epstein predicted that Trump, if "cornered," could trigger a larger conflict, including bombing Iran to create a crisis and rally public support back to himself. In text messages between Epstein and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon at or around 20 December 2018, Epstein variously wrote:
• You guys need to understand that he is psychotic. And would not blink twice at encouraging an attack on us [USA], so he can leap to the country's defense. mindset, If I go down, I'm taking everyone with [me].
• Cornering a rat, never a good idea.
• China, Paki[stan], Russia, turkey, Iran. he also might have just decided to trade the kurds to turkey for them standing down on Saudi. The game is now on.
Bannon replies: "My God! is he that cornered?" Epstein responds:
• Worse. Because it is not only him, it is his family Biz. I believe that [Russiagate special prosecutor Robert] mueller is making a mistake. treating him like he is organized crime. .. no org'd crime leader has a million man army.
• They are going drip by drip. But rats go crazy BEFORE the cage closes. Too much time. The republicans are beginning to understand.. I would not be surprised to see him do things that might encourage a real problem. So he can rush to the country's defense.
• We only had 2k troops there, if he were to bomb Iran, they would be slaughtered.
Bannon responds: "Oh, that would be crazy." Epstein replies:
• Not from his perspective.
Trapped and controlled
Before all of this we find astonishing, incurious silence from conservative commentators and a MAGA community in total denial. Crickets. Yet these are the same people who once pursued the Pizzagate paedophiles with gusto!
Perhaps, given the fear of galvanising the dire political alternative and Trump's relentless lawfare (4,095 lawsuits filed in three decades!), one may understand the silence. Nonetheless, it is both unconscionable and self-defeating. In light of Trump's bizarre and indefensible leading role in the cover-up, such information as we have presented, damning on the face of it, is worth serious consideration and widespread distribution and comment. But then, as Candace Owens put it: "MAGA died when Trump looked America in the face and said: 'Epstein who?'" The vital transparency that Trump brought to the White House in spades, died with it.
Those of us who held our noses and supported Trump to the hilt despite his notorious playboy past and Zionist upbringing, had hoped that that was all behind him. We gave him the benefit of the doubt for the sake of America electing a Great Disruptor to break the vice-like grip of the globalists and the international Deep State that was bankrupting and enslaving sovereign nations and running them into the ground. And, in his first term, he achieved many great things against impossible odds, not least the unprecedented modern feat of no new wars!
"Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly—not skilled!", Trump posted on 10 November 2013. In the event, even warmongering Obama did not attack Iran.
Who's the "unskilled" warmonger now?
He also started his second term with so much promise by unearthing networks of U.S. global corruption; confronting the Deep State in cavalier fashion. Today, DOGE is a distant memory, MAGA has become MIGA (Make Israel Great Again), and he's a business-as-usual/Zionist-controlled presidential stooge. Not so much The Great Disruptor as the Great Disappointment.
"[Zionist billionaire] Sheldon Adelson is looking to give big dollars to [Marco] Rubio because he feels he can mould him into his perfect little puppet. I agree!" Trump once cried about his then presidential opponent—before himself taking hundreds of millions from the same Sheldon Adelson and his widow!
Who's the puppet now?
Trump ran on transparency and draining the swamp. Well, "The Files" are nothing if not drain-the-swamp served up on a silver platter, yet he is sprinting away from them faster than Usain Bolt!
It all screams "Danger! Puppetry at Play!" Seemingly, he is trapped and controlled by the Washington "gridlock of sexual blackmail" that the late Senator John DeCamp lamented all those years ago. Same old, same old. And perhaps that was Epstein's central task above all others: to blackmail Trump for Mossad to keep him in Israel's pocket—with a view to triggering war with Iran that Mr Netanyahu publicly states he has coveted for 40 years.
Nowadays, Trump 2.0 is convivial with all the swamp-dwellers Trump 1.0 righteously claimed to despise. He even sympathises with the Clintons. Not so long ago he vehemently wanted to jail them!
After Bill and Hillary were called to testify before the House Oversight Committee about their ties to Epstein (about which they duly perjured their heads off) Trump sighed: "I think it's a shame. I hate to see it." He even sincerely wished "all the best" to Ghislaine Maxwell; a woman he once called out as "evil" to the Palm Beach police. If she keeps quiet to save his hide, would her exoneration by presidential pardon surprise anyone?
The bankers and their 'fixers'
In the end, despite all the dirt and darkness they contain the upside of the files is that they are such an epic reveal that conspiracies the media reflexively dismissed as 'theoretical' are now confirmed as factual. Workaday satanic paedophiles like Epstein and their enablers do run the world. But they do so on behalf of the puppet-masters, the ultra-elites who use intelligence services like the CIA, MI6 et.al. as their global 'fixers'.
Only recently, for instance, former CIA officer John Kiriakou related his experience while working at the U.S. embassy in Bahrain in his younger days. David Rockefeller flew in ostensibly to collect an award from Middle East bankers. Assigned to look after the trillionaire, Kiriakou naively assumed that the award ceremony was indeed the purpose of the visit. In fact, as the U.S. Ambassador informed him later, it was cover for Rockefeller's actual mission: viz., to tell Saddam Hussein to behave himself or be bombed to pieces. Having delivered his ultimatum, doubtless to protect his oil and other Middle Eastern interests, Rockefeller flew home on a military transport.
Obviously, the banking class of "ultra-elites" have their own pyramid of power, at the head of which infernal hierarchy sits the House of Rothschild. Their extreme wealth surpasses the Rockefellers and dwarfs that of Musk, Gates et. al. Paul Hutchinson summarised the modus operandi of these Luciferians pulling strings behind staged wars, crises and productions like the Epstein Show. During an August 2025 interview on the Franzese Wines podcast he said (my transcript; original emphases):
There is a book called Pawns in the Game, written by William Carr, almost a hundred years ago. He was in high-level military intelligence. And he'll drop a truth-bomb at the beginning of each one of the chapters of really where the control mechanisms are, in our world, and who's behind them. Then he'll spend the next chapter proving what he just dropped.
And the truth-bombs he throws out are things like, the, uh, I wanna call them, the agreements, the covenants with the Luciferian order that people like the Rothschilds made in the 1700s. And he provides evidence of this.
And what it is, okay, the agreement is they're going to have full control of the financial system, of the media etcetera, and they're going to take humanity down this road of using sexual blackmail and other things to be able to put us in a position where we lose our fundamental moral values, where we separate from a connection with God.
Even World War One, World War Two, and then again World War Three, orchestrated by these ultra-elites. You know, we think that the movie stars we know, or the President or these billionaire families are elites. No, those guys are paupers compared to the guys who are really making the decisions, who are worth so much money. More money than, than, Elon [Musk] times ten, some of these families. But we don't know about it because they're the ones behind the banking organisations etcetera.
Thus, when we gasp at the levels of impunity and unadulterated evil of these fraudulent state and corporate 'leaders' on the world stage, despairing that so very few of them are ever held to account, it is these overarching puppet-masters—the Money Managers—who guarantee their protection. As investigative writer Celia Farber remarks: "The cause of everything, always, is the Babylonian banking system, that is so evil, so vast, invisible, and inscrutable—we prefer almost anything to facing it." The Jesse on Fire podcast concurs:
When we're talking about these people... they could do anything they want. There's not a limit to what they can do and get away with it because they run the entire world, they own everything. They own everything. Everything. They own it all. And if you represent them, and if they are what we think they are then, guess what, there are no limits to what your behaviour can be.
Many more now realise that this is no exaggeration. Especially in view of the obvious cover-up we have related, whereby the Department of Justice violated the provisions of the very law enacted to ensure transparency! Beyond the DOJ, however, the fingerprints of the usual intel suspects are everywhere. Thomas Hampson writes:
In my three-part report on the Epstein case, I concluded that three possible explanations existed for the government’s failure to properly investigate and prosecute the case: incompetence of investigative and prosecutorial authorities, corruption by those authorities, or intelligence agency intervention on national security grounds. I ruled out incompetence because federal law enforcement agents rank among the best in the world. I ruled out isolated corruption because too many people across too many agencies would need to be compromised. That left intelligence agency intervention as the only logical explanation.
The recent document release and the DOJ’s systematic violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act don’t change my earlier conclusion. The pattern of obstruction is too coordinated, too sophisticated, and too resistant to both congressional oversight and statutory mandates to be anything but intentional suppression.
Speaking from his vast investigative experience, Hampson goes on to state that, in the end (my emphases):
The Epstein case represents one of the most serious failures of justice in modern American history. A sex-trafficking, blackmail, and international business-corruption operation that abused more than 1,000 victims, involved billions of dollars in financial transactions, spanned multiple countries and decades, and had connections to intelligence agencies and the highest levels of business and government has resulted in the prosecution of exactly two individuals [Epstein and Maxwell]—one of whom died before trial.
For those of us who investigate corruption and have spent careers trying to hold powerful institutions accountable, this case serves as a stark reminder: without transparency, there can be no accountability. When the government can violate transparency laws with impunity, accountability becomes impossible.
The question now is not what the Epstein files reveal. We know what they would reveal if released in compliance with the law. The question is whether the American people will accept this blatant defiance of a federal statute or demand that their elected representatives use every tool at their disposal—including contempt citations, defunding, and impeachment—to compel compliance.
In my earlier report, I quoted Dietrich Bonhoeffer: “Not to act is to act. Not to speak is to speak.” The DOJ has acted—by violating the law. Congress has the power to act—by refusing to accept the DOJ’s defiance.
The question is whether they will. If they don’t, the Epstein case will stand as permanent evidence that our government can violate federal law with impunity to protect powerful criminals—and that in America, some people truly are above the law.
The Big Picture
Momentously, therefore, the files, like the Covid shock, have occasioned a million awakenings. A somnolent public is increasingly wise to the divide-&-conquer 'left' vs 'right' paradigm and more attuned to the Big Picture. 'Is the world now little more than a giant movie set of endless, orchestrated dramas starring obvious actors like Keir Starmer, Volodymyr Zelensky, Emmanuel Macron, Erika Kirk et. al.?', they ask themselves.
As they peruse the Epstein files they verify their long-held queasy feelings and worst fears that nothing is what it seems; that nothing is beyond the realms of possibility. To include the fate of Epstein himself. Informed by the combined efforts of internet sleuths and alternative media they wonder if the many inexplicable/suspicious/ludicrous circumstances surrounding his death (like the telltale announcement of his 'suicide' the day before it happened!) point to his still being alive? The corporate media's "conspiracy theory" trope no longer holds them in thrall.
They even dare to question if the MAGA movement in general, like its Zionist/Mossad-infiltrated subset Turning Point USA, was a staged production from the beginning? One more piece of polarising theatre to be instrumentalised by masonic overseers?
In the same way that Obama was selected to bail out the banks, sell out the homeowners, ratchet up the lucrative war on terror and sign off a healthcare plan for the insurance and pharmaceutical giants—because the Left would've resisted if Republicans had done that—they wonder if Trump was similarly selected: to put conservatives to sleep with a pro-life/pro-family/pro-sovereignty/pro-God platform while overseeing consolidation of the "digital grid"—the totalising CBDC social credit score-surveillance state—via Peter Thiel's Palantir and other technocratic AI/biometric/satellite monsters tracking our every move—because if Democrats did that the Right would resist? ... Hmm...
Certainly, that would all make sense if Congressman Thomas Massie is correct about systemic corruption. Reporting on his having received a flash drive containing the entirety of the Epstein files unredacted, the "Life take two!" podcast stated on 14 February:
[Massie] has claimed that they're all in on it. All the politicians, all the media members, all the world leaders. [...] Tom Massie has said himself, that if he were to bring these public, that it's going go to bring down the entire system.
Trump's cover-upperer in chief, Attorney-General Pam Bondi, has reached the same conclusion, stating that if they prosecute everyone in the Epstein files the whole system will collapse.
So be it. The network shoring up the Culture of Death and Exploitation must be pulverised. Airing the dark content of the files as we have done is a fundamental, dutiful step in that direction. Besides which, given that Epstein himself is not so much the scandal as the Godless symptom, and that another actor is surely being prepped to take his place in the next filthy, ruinous production, the implosion of the entire satanic edifice appeals not only to our sense of justice but also to our instinct for survival!
However, we should temper our enthusiasm somewhat and keep our wits about us because razing the system will be conducive to instability and chaos; conditions that favour parasitic elites. For these, crashing systems or entire countries are windows of opportunity: to establish worse scams and accrue even more power through the false promise of "peace and security" [1Thess. 5:3]; feeding off new networks of corruption erected on the rubble of their cataclysmic failures. For, evil never sleeps.
"I believe there are entities that are supernaturally evil, actually demon-possessed world leaders, that follow the commands of Lucifer," stated renowned radio host, filmmaker, author and archeological dig expert Steve Quayle recently. "They want the destruction of human beings and everything glorious God made. ... We are watching the identification of humans, the vilification of humans and the nullification of humans. The elite want the destruction of humans. . .. We really are at a time of unparalleled evil and upheaval." The Epstein files put it all on show.
So, as we plead with God to strike down the entire 'production', let us pray, too, that He thwarts all attempts to instrumentalise the outcome according to Problem-Reaction-Solution: the perennial playbook that co-opts crises to manufacture ever more centralised control of nations, national treasuries, and life on earth; turning the world into China.
In these clear and present End Times, may the Immaculata—the pure and holy antithesis of all things Epstein—crush the head of the old serpent and scatter his seed; now waging total war against her seed [Gen 3:15]. And may God hasten this promised Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, so as to usher in the Social Reign of the Risen King speedily. In these twin victories lie our abiding and only hope of vanquishing this "crooked and perverse generation" [Phil. 2:15].
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Founded in 1991 by Epstein sugar daddy Les Wexner and Charles Bronfman, the MEGA Group was described publicly as a secretive club of approximately twenty of the nation’s wealthiest and most influential Jewish businessmen, paying membership dues of around $30,000 per year. A published analysis showed that MEGA was viewed by Israeli intelligence officials as a channel for espionage and influence in America. The group’s members, by virtue of being among the largest political donors in both the US and Israel, had access to both governments and their intelligence communities. The mission, as articulated by members of the group, was explicitly governmental: advancing Israel’s interests by influencing US foreign policy, particularly on Middle East issues. (Epstein entered this network in 1987, the same year Wexner became his exclusive financial client, granting him power of attorney over his finances and, by 1991—the same year MEGA was founded—full control of the Wexner financial empire. Wexner transferred to Epstein a $77 million Manhattan mansion outfitted with surveillance cameras, along with properties in Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Epstein’s network was, in substantial part, built with Wexner’s Mossad-connected resources.