January 2025
Starmergeddon as Salvation!
An awful lot can happen in just one political week never mind the several that could pass before this edition lands. At the time of writing, however, the UK is on the ropes being pummelled by calamitous levels of deceit and incompetence not seen since the Blair years; under a patriotic but ever more 'pragmatic' president-elect America is on a rousing albeit precarious roll; and the world is on the brink as the usual suspects stoke chaos, fear and even nuclear Armageddon in a last ditch attempt to protect their globalist rackets from the Trans-World Trump Express — before it retakes control of national mainlines and shunts their nefarious 2030 agenda into a siding.
That's the gist. But of course it's all far more complicated. Unlikely political scenarios and alliances excite New Year hopes and expectations even as potentially drastic backfires loom large.
At home, the PM's manifest death-wish for himself and the nation — Starmergeddon — has evoked a British rebirth. Suddenly, the politically impossible is looking very possible; the soaring popularity of Reform UK raising hopes of a viable challenge to the Uniparty's ruinous grip on power. Its party membership (independently verified) now stands in excess of 170,000, having surpassed the Conservatives. Early January headlines tell the tale: "Reform UK Chair says party gained 46,000 members in last two weeks of December" — "Reform just six points off becoming biggest party, says election predictor."
Notably, a 3 January mega-poll by political strategy firm Stonehaven (which company boasted the most accurate seat-by-seat projection in the 2024 election), found that "most of the increases in Reform support have come from 2024 Labour voters, not the Tories." Citing a December 20-23 poll by "More in Common", LBC radio also noted that "1 in 4 Labour voters regret the decision to vote for them." The same poll also revealed that six in ten (62%) think Labour are not taking immigration seriously enough. Referring to this "dramatic picture" in a major constituency-by-constituency breakdown of voters, Stonehaven found that: "If there were an election tomorrow [i.e., on 4 January], Labour would lose its majority, dropping from 411 seats to 278. Reform UK would surge from 5 seats to 120, while the Conservatives would make modest gains, rising to 157 seats."
Concurrently, The Telegraph reported that: "If [Reform] reached 28 per cent of the popular vote at an election, it would likely became the largest force in the House of Commons, though short of an overall majority. On current polling trends, Reform would reach this threshold within six months if it continues to pick up support at the current rate."
This gels with the Daily Mail headline of 4 January: Furious voters deliver damning verdict on PM amid anger over migration, winter fuel payments and inheritance tax on farmers. Keir Starmer will be out of No 10 within a year, poll predicts.
We should all thank God for this possibility and pray earnestly that it eventuates. Since, as intimated by the whopping 3,000,000+ signatories of an online petition calling for a new election (signatures garnered within a mere two-week period), there is something decidedly 'off' about this implacable, uncomprehending Prime Minister. A man who could not read a room if it were built with capital letters, his vacant stare — like a deer caught in headlights — recalls the startled unblinking expression of Tony Blair when he too defended the indefensible.
Steeped from a young age in the mechanistic tenets of Marxism which clearly moulded his bloodless technocratic persona, Mr Starmer is considered by ex-Labour Trotskyite Peter Hitchens to be even further to the left than former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, an extreme left wing-socialist. The liberal political editor of ITV notes in addition that "[Starmer] is the most ruthless politician that any of us have known, possibly for decades." Little wonder he embraces the entire socialist spectrum! Whether the softer technocratic tyranny of fascistic (right wing-socialist) bodies like the World Economic Forum, or the rock-hard communism of Black Lives Matter and China, Keir channels them all.
Thus, primed for international socialism (aka globalism) over and above the national sovereignty increasingly demanded by the hard-pressed electorate, reports of his immediate inordinate jet-setting were to be expected. "Total time airborne since election: 169 hours and 15 minutes. Starmer has spent one working month on planes since becoming PM," tweeted the Guido Fawkes political website on 9 December. That is, one month out of five was spent strutting the globalist stage, feathering his post-Downing Street nest like the Fabian Socalist Blair before him.
We should not be the least surprised, therefore, that this Animal Farm caricature lacks empathy for the proles and their deep-rooted attachment to their culture and sovereign freedoms. However careless or complacent Brits may have been in this regard, Mr Starmer has only served to deepen those ancient innate attachments. And as the electorate rails against his total disconnect from its workaday struggles and overriding concerns, his self-destructive bent simultaneously energises the populace. For the present mood of the country, captured and quantified in numerous national polls, radiates one certainty: that unless he comprehensively legalises the alternative woke universe he inhabits — actually formalising the British police state that now exists de-facto — his hackneyed socialist programme for "change" at the service of globalist agendas simply will not stand.
In the meantime, as outrageous cautions and arrests of mainstream and alternative media journalists ramp up (for innocuous social media posts; one 12 months old and long deleted!), and despite relentless reports that dark secrets pertaining to his private life will soon emerge, Mr Starmer is not for turning. Indeed, he has issued an ultimatum to 'dissidents' to get on board with his ruinous agenda, or get out: as in leave the country! "I say this with all candour," he declared. "If you don't like the changes we've implemented the door is open, you are free to leave."
Such arrogance and entitlement! Voters can hardly believe their eyes and ears. The Prime Minister targets pensioners, farmers, workers, businesses and charities — stripping away basic needs, emptying wallets and endangering company bottom lines — even as he ingratiates himself with his globalist comrades by doling out billions of taxpayer pounds to international projects. He has also contrived to deny more than 9 million people their vote by facilitating the cancellation of council elections scheduled for May, as he fast-tracks the biggest overhaul of local government in more than 50 years (—an agenda that harks back to the attempted EU-regionalisation of the UK under Blair). These plans have been especially welcomed by councils in areas where Reform were expected to perform particularly well, including Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Devon. Election administration officials say the cost of preparing cancelled elections alone could waste £200 million.
Undaunted by the outrage triggered across the board by his dictatorial overreach, the PM has even made time to provoke a nuclear leviathan! It is a measure of the dilettantish menace he poses locally and globally that he urged America to greenlight the firing of British-made Storm Shadow cruise missiles into Russian territory by Ukraine right after President Putin announced on 12 September that doing so would "mean that...the United States and European countries are at war with Russia"! Unlike Mr Starmer, even the warmongering handlers of the medically demented Joe Biden understood the ramifications of that blunt declaration, and the consequent need to continue the US policy of prohibiting such actions (—which prudent outlook was not reversed until 18 November, on the pretext of North Korean troops reportedly being dispatched to Russia to join the fighting against Ukrainian forces).
Should Mr Starmer continue along his suicidal path, tanking the nation in the process of wrecking his own premiership and the viability of his party, we should hold onto our hats. For the Telegraph notes that "With 31 per cent of the vote Reform would win a majority, making Mr Farage prime minister."
As with the first Trump presidency, not a few readers will reflexively hold their nose at that prospect. But they should pause to consider the state of the nation: the perilous predicament fashioned for us by a scornful WEFminster Establishment in thrall to woke culture and foreign interests. It has now spewed forth the Keir creature: the latest and worst in a long bi-partisan line of toxic 'heirs to Blair' that must be effaced once and for all, before the steady electoral advance of the burgeoning Muslim electorate morphs into a "sharia" political bloc to replace Reform as the primary alternative contender. Faced with that oppressive stench, which would make even Two-Tier Kier seem even-handed and empathetic, current naysayers would suddenly find the odour of Mr Farage and Reform very fragrant indeed.
Yet it all begs the sixty-four thousand dollar question: Can the new Reform kids on the block maintain sufficient coherence and party unity to continue their astonishing momentum, or will they split into acrimonious pieces and crumble? As with Donald Trump's proposed administration (a two-edged sword of inspired MAGA choices and Zionist placemen) only time will tell. Already there are resignations and infighting, especially over the appropriate political response to folk hero Tommy Robinson; hugely popular among Reform voters for bravely confronting Muslim impunity in general and rape gangs in particular. Since the complicit press defends the status quo it will seize every opportunity to inflame such disagreements and tensions within Reform's ranks, joining Labour and the CINOs (Conservatives In Name Only) in demonising commonsense agendas as Hitlerian.
On cue, in a recent TV interview former deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman called Reform "a threat to democracy." While Keir Starmer went as far as dismissing calls for another national inquiry into the so-called 'grooming gangs' as "a far-Right bandwagon." Waving away the role played by British officialdom in the ongoing sexual abuse and rape of untold numbers of white English girls by Pakistani Muslims — over several decades in at least 50 towns! — he forced all Labour MPs who voted on the matter to vote against the proposed inquiry, while he and his inner circle abstained from voting; thereby conveniently avoiding close scrutiny of what he himself did, or did not do about the gangs while Director of Public Prosecutions. He also supported WEFminster's village idiot (aka foreign secretary David Lammy) who had once denounced Donald Trump as a "neo-Nazi sympathising sociopath"!
Employing offensive, idiotic statements and ploys to avoid accountability for iron-fisted injustice, deceit, scandal and sheer incompetence has built up such a MAGA-like appetite for tearing down the corrupt status quo that, as with Brexit, even the media may be powerless to stop it. So we may dare to hope that the great possibilities opened up by Starmergeddon will be realised.
We may never see the scorched-earth programme necessary for total reform — i.e., razing the BBC's subversive TV/radio/internet Empire to the ground, and dismantling the monolithic, self-perpetuating, all-powerful permanent bureaucracy. Nonetheless, if the tidal wave of public fury rolls on till the next election, enough transparency, truth and accountability might be ushered in to resolve a good number of the nation's intractable woes. If that righteous reaction is not sustained, on the other hand, Mr Starmer will continue to act out and impose, with impunity, the despotism demanded by his Marxist formation.